Family Context and Academic Performance for Grade Schoolers
Introduction
On an international scale, parental interest in school has long been heralded as an of import and positive variable on children'due south academic and socioemotional development. From an ecological framework, reciprocal positive interactions between these two key socializing spheres – families and schools – contribute positively to a child's socioemotional and cerebral development (Bronfenbrenner, 1987). Empirical findings have demonstrated a positive association between parental interest in didactics and bookish achievement (Pérez Sánchez et al., 2013; Tárraga et al., 2017), improving children's self-esteem and their academic performance (Garbacz et al., 2017) also as schoolhouse memory and attendance (Ross, 2016). Family involvement has as well been institute to be associated with positive schoolhouse attachment on the part of children (Alcalay et al., 2005) too as positive school climates (Cowan et al., 2012). Research has also evidenced that programs focused on increasing parental involvement in instruction have positive impacts on children, families, and school communities (Jeynes, 2012; Catalano and Catalano, 2014).
Parent-schoolhouse partnership allows for the conceptualization of roles and relationships and the bear upon on the evolution of children in a broader way (Christenson and Reschly, 2010). From this approach, families and schools are the master actors in the construction of their roles and forms of involvement, generating new and varied actions to relate to each other according to the specific educational context. The master findings in the family-school field show a positive influence of this partnership, contributing to academic achievement and performance, amidst other positive consequences (Epstein and Sander, 2000; Hotz and Pantano, 2015; Sebastian et al., 2017).
There is likewise strong support from international research showing the positive influence of parental involvement over academic achievement, as has been demonstrated in a variety of meta-analyses across different populations and educational levels (Castro et al., 2015; Jeynes, 2016; Ma et al., 2016). Moreover, although there is a broad range of parental interest definitions, some more general and others more than specifics, in that location is a consensus among research results almost the positive influence of parental involvement over child bookish achievement. For example, in the meta-synthesis of Wilder (2014), where nine meta-analyses are analyzed, this influence was consequent throughout the studies, regardless the dissimilar definitions and measures used.
However, most of the studies on parental interest in instruction hail from anglophone countries and are based on cross-sectional and correlational designs (Garbacz et al., 2017) while in Latin America research remains scarce. In a recent systematic review of the literature on parental involvement in instruction in Latin America, but one Mexican study from 1998 was constitute which was besides heavily influenced past interventions from the United States (Roth Eichin and Volante Beach, 2018). Republic of chile has acknowledged the importance of collaborative relationships between families and schools developing a National Policy for Fathers, Mothers and Legal Guardians Participation in the Educational System (Política de Participación de Padres, Madres y Apoderados/every bit en el Sistema Educativo) in 2002 which was recently updated in 2017 (Ministerio de Educación, Gobierno de Chile, 2017). Since the publication of this policy various local initiatives have sprouted in the state seeking to strengthen schoolhouse family relations (Saracostti-Schwartzman, 2013). Withal, the majority of research in the country has thus far been of a qualitative nature with a focus on describing relations betwixt family members and their schools, and identifying tensions between these ii spheres (Gubbins, 2011).
Thus, this report seeks to advance the assay of the effects of parental involvement in school on the academic achievement of Chilean students. The report aims to analyse how different parental interest profiles (based on the main forms of parental involvement identified in literature) influence children's academic achieved. Parental involvement tin can take a broad variety of forms, among them, communication between family and schoolhouse, supporting learning activities at home and involvement in school activities have been highlighted (Schueler et al., 2017), these are included in this study using the scales proposed by Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler (2005).
Materials and Methods
Participants and Procedure
The study included 498 parents or guardians whose children attended second and 3rd grade in 16 public schools with high levels of socioeconomical vulnerability (over 85% co-ordinate to official records of the schools) inside iii different regions in Republic of chile (Libertador Bernando O'Higgins, Maule and Araucanía). Parents and guardians were anile between 20 and 89 years old (One thousand = 35.02, SD = 7.02 for parents, Yard = 59.27, SD = 11.74 for grandparents and M = 43.14, SD = 15.41 for other guardians) and students between vii and 12 (M = 8.30, SD = 0.93). The majority of them were mothers (83.9%). The majority of fathers and mothers had completed high school (33.i and 40.6%, respectively), followed by elementary education (28.1 and 23.3%, respectively), no education completed (17.3% for both), professional championship (seven.ii and six.eight%, respectively) and university title (4.four and four.6%, respectively).
This report is part of a wider project focusing on the effectiveness of interventions aimed at strengthening the link between families and schools. This study has the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Universidad de La Frontera and the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Enquiry (Acta 066-2017, Folio 036-17). Prior to data collection, after obtaining permission from the schools, informed consent forms were signed by the students' legal guardians to qualify their participation. The data referring to the students (evaluation of learning outcomes) was compiled through official school records. The data referring to the families (parental interest) was nerveless in paper format during parent teacher meetings at the end of the schoolhouse yr considering their behavior during the preceding year. Two research assistants trained for this purpose were present for the applications.
Instruments
Parental involvement was assessed using the five scales proposed by Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler (2005) that aim to measure the level of family involvement in children's education in elementary schoolhouse from the point of view of the fathers, mothers and/or guardians. Scales accept been adapted and validated by a panel of experts in Chile (Reininger, 2014). Scales included in this study are: (1) Parental involvement activities at home [five items, such as "someone in this family (father, mother and/or guardian) helps the kid report for test" or "someone in this family unit (father, female parent and/or guardian) practices spelling, math or other skills with the child"]; (2) Parental involvement activities at schoolhouse (five items, such every bit "someone in this family unit attends parent–teacher association meetings" or "someone in this family unit attends special events at school"), (three) Child invitations for involvement (five items, such united states of america "my child asks me to talk with his or her instructor" or "my child asks me to supervise his or her homework"); (4) Teacher invitations for involvement (six items, such as "my child's teacher asks me to help out at school" or "my child's instructor asks me to talk with my child about the school 24-hour interval"); and (5) Full general school invitations for involvement (half dozen items, such as "this schoolhouse staff contact me promptly nearly any problem involving my child" or "parents' activities are scheduled at this school so that nosotros tin attend"). The first four scales take a four-point Likert response calibration, that signal the frequency of the items, from 0 (never) to three (e'er). The terminal scale has a five-point Likert calibration response, indicating the grade of understanding with the items, from 1 (strongly disagree) to five (strongly concur). Scales can be consulted equally Supplementary Tables ane–5. Internal consistency of all scales was adequate (α = 0.79, α = 0.72, α = 0.72, α = 0.85, and α = 0.87, respectively).
Students' academic achievement was evaluated thought the final average class obtained at the end of the school year, recorded in a scale from i (minimum accomplishment) to 7 (maximum achievement).
Results
Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify parental involvement profiles based on the five subscales of parental interest scale (typified to avoid the influence of the dissimilar scale responses), applying the standardized Euclidian Distance method and using Ward's algorithm. Cluster analyses results showed that the optimal solution was the grouping of the participants into three groups. In Figure one the typified scores of each of the variables considered to calculate the groups are shown.
Figure one. Parental involvement profiles.
To label the groups, we examined the family involvement profiles by computing a one-manner ANOVA on the standardized scores of the v parental involvement scales with the clusters serving as the factors. The result revealed that the clustering variables significantly differed between the involvement scales [Parental involvement at dwelling house: F(two,497) = 147.83, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.37; Parental interest at school: F(2,497) = 148.82, p< 0.001, η2 = 0.38; Child invitation for interest: F(2,497) = 225.34, p< 0.001, η2 = 0.48; Instructor invitation for involvement: F(two,497) = 84.77, p< 0.001, η2 = 0.26; Full general school Invitation for involvement: F(2,497) = 53.38, p< 0.001, η2 = 0.eighteen]. Scheffe mail service hoc multiple comparisons showed the differences were statistically significant between all the parental involvement profiles in all variables, with the first cluster scoring college than the second and the third in all the scales, and the second higher that the third. Based on these differences and the scores, the start cluster was labeled as High involved parents, representing 144 parents (28.9%) that scored to a higher place the hateful in all the interest scales (from 0.54 to 0.91 standards deviations). The 2nd cluster was named Medium involved parents, including 228 parents (45.8%) that have scores close to the media in all the interest scales (from -0.14 to 0.16 standards deviations). Finally, the third cluster was classified as Depression involved parents, including 126 parents (25.three%) that scored below the mean in all the involvement scales (from -0.61 to -0.91 standards deviations). Tabular array one shows demographic information for the clusters.
Tabular array 1. Demographic information of the clusters.
Finally, ANOVA results showed that there were pregnant differences in academic accomplishment scores betwixt the three clusters of parent involvement profiles, F(2,430) = five.37, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.03. Scheffe post hoc multiple comparisons showed that high (M = v.97, SD = 0.49) and medium (K = vi.00, SD = 0.fifty) involved parents had children with higher academic achievement than low involved parents (1000 = 5.8, SD = 0.47). Complementarily, results from correlations betwixt parental involvement and academic achievement scores support these results, showing a pregnant and positive correlation(r = 0.14, p = 0.003).
Discussion
From the results presented, nosotros tin conclude the beingness of three different profiles of parental involvement (high, medium and low) considering different scales of parental interest (at domicile, at school and through the invitations made by the children, the teachers and the schoolhouse). Secondly, results showed that there were differences in bookish achievement scores betwixt the parent involvement profiles, where high and medium involved parents had children with higher academic accomplishment than low involved parents.
Equally shown, international literature reveals that the degree of parental involvement is a disquisitional chemical element in the academic achievements of children, specially during their offset schoolhouse years highlighting the demand to generate scientific evidence from the Chilean context. Most of the studies in this surface area come up from anglophone countries (Garbacz et al., 2017) while in the Latin American context enquiry is all the same scarce. Results from our study corroborate that parental involvement can contribute alike in other cultural contexts, pointing to the need to likewise implement policies to promote it.
In this context, Republic of chile has acknowledged the importance of collaborative relationships betwixt parents and schools leading to the development a National Policy for Male parent, Mother and Legal Guardian Participation. Nevertheless, most of the enquiry in the country has thus far been of a qualitative nature with a focus on describing family unit-school relations and identifying tensions between these two spheres (Gubbins, 2011). Thus, this study seeks to make progress in the analysis of the effect of parental involvement and children'southward and bookish achievements of Chilean students.
Ideals Argument
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Proclamation of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Commission of the Universidad de La Frontera and the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research.
Author Contributions
MS developed the study concept and the study design. LL substantially contributed to the study concept, and performed the data assay and interpretation. MS and LL drafted the manuscript. All the authors approved the last version of the manuscript. They also agreed to be answerable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This work was supported past FONDECYT 1170078 of the National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research of Republic of chile.
Disharmonize of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or fiscal relationships that could be construed every bit a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Fabric for this article can be establish online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/ten.3389/fpsyg.2019.01464/total#supplementary-material.
References
Alcalay, Fifty., Milicic, Northward., and Toretti, A. (2005). Alianza efectiva familia-escuela: un programa audiovisual para padres. Psychke xiv, 149–161. doi: ten.4067/S0718-22282005000200012
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). La Ecología del Desarrollo Humano. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.
Google Scholar
Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, Due east., López-Martín, East., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, Due east., and Gaviria, J. J. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Catalano, H., and Catalano, C. (2014). The importance of the school-family relationship in the kid'southward intellectual and social development. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 128, 406–414. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.179
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Christenson, Southward. 50., and Reschly, A. L. (2010). Handbook of School-Family Partnerships. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Cowan, G., Bobby, K., St. Roseman, P., and Echandia, A. (2012). Evaluation Report: The Dwelling house Visit Project. ERIC database No. ED466018.
Google Scholar
Epstein, J. L., and Sander, M. (2000). Handbook of the Sociologic of Education. New York, NY: Springer.
Google Scholar
Garbacz, Due south. A., Herman, One thousand. C., Thompson, A. M., and Reinke, W. M. (2017). Family unit engagement in education and intervention: implementation and evaluation to maximize family, school, and student outcomes. J. Sch. Psychol. 62, i–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.002
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gubbins, V. (2011). Estrategias de Involucramiento Parental de Estudiantes con Buen Rendimiento Escolar en Educación Básica. Doctoral dissertation, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago.
Google Scholar
Hoover-Dempsey, Grand., and Sandler, H. (2005). The Social Context of Parental Involvement: A Path to Enhanced Achievement. Final Report OERI/IES grant No. R305T010673. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
Google Scholar
Jeynes, W. H. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental interest programs for urban students. Urban Educ. 47, 706–742. doi: 10.1177/0042085912445643
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Jeynes, Westward. H. (2016). A Meta-Assay: the human relationship between parental involvement and Latino student outcomes. Educ. Urban Soc. 49, 4–28. doi: 10.1177/0013124516630596
CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
Ma, X., Shen, J., Krenn, H. Y., Hu, S., and Yuan, J. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of the human relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during early childhood pedagogy and early on elementary instruction. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 28, 771–801. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9351-1
CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
Pérez Sánchez, C. N., Betancort Montesinos, M., and Cabrera Rodríguez, L. (2013). Family influences in academic accomplishment: a study of the Canary Islands. Rev. Int. Sociol. 71, 169–187. doi: 10.3989/ris.2011.04.11
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Reininger, T. (2014). Parental Interest in Municipal Schools in Chile: Why exercise Parents Choose to get Involved? Ph.D. dissertation, Fordham Academy Graduate School of Social Service, New York, NY.
Google Scholar
Ross, T. (2016). The differential effects of parental involvement on high school completion and postsecondary omnipresence. Educ. Policy Anal. Curvation. 24, 1–38. doi: x.14507/epaa.v24.2030
CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
Roth Eichin, Northward., and Volante Beach, P. (2018). Liderando alianzas entre escuelas, familias y comunidades: una revisión sistemática. Rev. Complut. Educ. 29, 595–611. doi: 10.5209/RCED.53526
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Saracostti-Schwartzman, Thousand. (2013). Familia, Escuela y Comunidad I: Una Alianza Necesaria Para un Modelo de Intervención biopsicosocial Positive. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.
Google Scholar
Schueler, B. Due east., McIntyre, J. C., and Gehlbach, H. (2017). Measuring parent perceptions of family–school engagement: the development of new survey tools. Sch. Commun. J. 27, 275–301.
Google Scholar
Sebastian, J., Moon, J.-M., and Cunningham, M. (2017). The Relationship of school-based parental involvement with educatee accomplishment: a comparison of principal and parent survey reports from PISA 2012. Educ. Stud. 43, 123–146. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2016.1248900
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Tárraga, V., García, B., and Reyes, J. (2017). Dwelling house-based family involvement and academic achievement: a case written report in main education. Educ. Stud. 44, 361–375. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2017.1373636
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Wilder, Southward. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic accomplishment: a meta-synthesis. Educ. Rev. 66, 377–397. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2013.780009
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01464/full